GMO labeling movement overlooks Roundup dangers

The following article lays out a bizarre history of a seemingly blatant conspiracy to limit population with toxic treachery and famine. While people cry wolf about the GMO foods causing cancer it overlooks the FACT that the chemical herbicide glyphosate/Roundup is a major component in the ill health effects. Therefore there should be a move to label for glyphosate, no just GMOs, since it is used for other non-GMO crops.

This link is to the outline of a discussion with an MIT Senior Research Scientist, Dr. Stephanie Seneff. 

GLYPHOSATE: Monsanto’s Magnificent Red Herring [The Liberty Beacon]

In 1972 these words were uttered in an interview of Robert S. MacNamara who at the time was head of the World Bank and also former Secretary of Defense famous for admitting war in Vietnam was started on false pretenses (see the documentary Fog of War). 

”One must take draconian measures of demographic reduction against the will of the populations. Reducing the birth rate has proved to be impossible or insufficient. One must therefore increase the mortality rate. How? By natural means: famine and sickness.”

In 1974 a Monsanto scientist discovered that Glyphosate, a chemical used to CLEAN PIPES was an effective herbicide. I am pretty sure if you pour inorganic chemicals on things it does not help with that organisms survival. Since then it has been all up in the food supply.

This laid the groundwork for making genetic modifications to plants so they can survive the chemicals being applied to them. The major funding source for this research turns out to be the Rockefeller foundation. 

Later on trade agreements guaranteed Monsanto's market with trade agreements (not-so-free market BS) and insulated them from liability for this toxic practice. For instance, when these frankenfoods cross-pollinate neighboring crops Monsanto is not only absolved from paying damages but even can effectively sue for copyright infringement. 

A French study in 2008 showed the cancerous effects on rats of GMO and despite this in 2013 the EPA increased by 3,000% the permissible limits of glyphosate. They might as well call Roundup RoundDown since it is clearly population control and a subsidy to the Medical Industrial Complex.

Good luck having a revolution with a bunch of tumors eating your body. If it wasn't for genetic modification these chemicals would kill the plants food is harvested from. It is pretty much a surrogate for feeding sheeple chemikills. 

On top of this toxic chemical tendency includes a worsened interaction with other things that pollute the human body. Patents have expired in the early 90's and copycat versions have since proliferated. Sri Lanka has actually banned Glyphosate due to the effects on the liver and kidneys. 

One way to avoid RoundDown produce is looking at the PLU code:

"Anything that is modified shows up with a code beginning with a 5 or an 8. Organic produce codes begin with a 9, while conventionally-grown produce codes start with a 3 or a 4. ... Conventionally-grown produce can still have been subjected to Glyphosate in RoundUp, and still merit use of the codes beginning with 3 or 4."

So if the GMO labeling campaign is a success it is a faux-victory since they even create other GMO-ish plant varieties by exposing them to radiation that are not considered to be GMO. If you want healthy food it should be done yourself. Otherwise you can be stuffing little Trojan horses in your face and not ever know it.